TIB finds Cyber Security Ordinance another deceptive move

Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB) has labelled the proposed Cyber Security Ordinance 2024 as another attempt to deceive and mislead the public.

At a press conference held in Dhanmondi, Dhaka, on Tuesday (December 31), TIB strongly criticised the approval of the ordinance by the Advisory Council without revisions, arguing that it would likely serve as a tool to suppress freedom of expression, media, and speech.

TIB Executive Director Dr Iftekharuzzaman expressed dissatisfaction with the ordinance’s formulation process, stating, "The process was rushed and lacked transparency. The Law Commission was not involved, which raises serious concerns."

He added, “The ordinance appears to replicate the flaws of the Digital Security Act and Cyber Security Act under a new name. It does not prioritise rights-based provisions and seems designed to curtail free speech rather than safeguard cyber security.”

TIB also pointed out inconsistencies in the ordinance. Muhammad Ershadul Karim, an Associate Professor at the University of Malaya, Malaysia, joined the press conference virtually to present a detailed review. "The ordinance includes provisions that were absent in the publicly circulated draft. Such practices in lawmaking reflect an attempt to mislead citizens," he said.

Dr Iftekharuzzaman noted that while the repeal of the controversial Cyber Security Act had offered some relief, the proposed ordinance leaves loopholes for further suppression of dissent and media freedoms. "If issued without thorough review and stakeholder participation, it will fail to serve its intended purpose and instead hinder democratic rights," he said.

TIB reiterated its previous call for at least a month-long consultation period to ensure inclusive stakeholder participation and proper revision of the draft.

TIB recommended extending the review period for the ordinance and involve all relevant stakeholders, ensuring transparency in the drafting process with input from the Law Commission, and eliminating any provisions that could infringe on freedom of expression and press freedom. 

The organisation urged the interim government to prioritise public interest and uphold constitutional rights while enacting such critical legislation.