Trials of a Covid-19 vaccine being developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford University will resume after it was paused due to a reported side effect in a patient in the UK, reports BBC.
On Tuesday, AstraZeneca said the studies were being paused while it investigated whether the reported side effect was connected with the vaccine.
But on Saturday, Oxford University said it had been deemed safe to continue.
The vaccine is seen as a strong contender among dozens being developed.
Oxford University said in a statement that it was "expected" that "some participants will become unwell" in large trials like this one.
The government's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, echoed this view, telling a Downing Street press conference on Wednesday what had happened in the Oxford trial was not unusual.
The university added that the studies could now resume following the recommendations of an independent safety review committee and the UK regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.
Oxford University said it would not disclose information about the patient's illness due to confidentiality reasons, but the New York Times reported that a volunteer in the UK trial had been diagnosed with transverse myelitis, an inflammatory syndrome that affects the spinal cord and can be caused by viral infections.
Hopes have been high that the vaccine might be one of the first to come on the market, following successful phase 1 and 2 testing.
Its move to Phase 3 testing in recent weeks has involved some 30,000 participants in the US as well as in the UK, Brazil and South Africa. Phase 3 trials in vaccines often involve thousands of participants and can last several years.
The World Health Organization (WHO) says nearly 180 vaccine candidates are being tested around the world but none has yet completed clinical trials.
US President Donald Trump has said he wants a vaccine available in the US before 3 November's election, but his comments have raised fears that politics may be prioritised over safety in the rush for a vaccine.
But the WHO's chief scientist has said that countries must not start "cutting corners" in the race to develop a vaccine.
"Just because we talk about speed and scale doesn't mean we start compromising or cutting corners on what would normally be assessed," Dr Soumya Swaminathan said on Wednesday.
"The process still has to follow through rules of the game. For drugs and vaccines which are given to people, you have to test their safety, first and foremost," she said.
Risk of 'losing control'
Official figures indicate the UK's coronavirus epidemic is growing again, after the R number - the reproduction rate of the virus - was raised to between 1 and 1.2 for the first time since March.
Meanwhile, daily coronavirus cases in Scotland have reached a four-month high, according to the Scottish government's latest data.
A total of 221 people tested positive for the virus in the past 24 hours - the highest daily figure since 8 May, when there were 225 positive tests.
Prof Sir Mark Walport, a member of the government's Sage scientific advisory group, has warned the UK is "on the edge of losing control of the virus".
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "You've only got to look across the Channel to see what is happening in France and what's happening in Spain."
It comes as new "rule of six" restrictions come into force on Monday, limiting indoor and outdoor gatherings to six people in England.
In Scotland, socialising will be limited to a maximum of six people inside and outside - but unlike England they must be from two households, and children under 12 are exempt.
In Wales, also from Monday, it will be illegal for more than six people from an extended household to meet indoors - but up to 30 can still meet outdoors.
A further 3,497 people have tested positive with the virus in the UK, according to the latest government data on Saturday.
Meanwhile, Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove has suggested fines may be needed to ensure people self-isolate when required.
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I don't want to see fines being levied, but even more I do not want to see people behaving in a way that puts the most vulnerable at risk."